AIKEK Stats

Updated 11 minutes ago

Loading chart data…

AIKEK is getting increasingly decentralized. As of now, the medium-and-small holders — wallets each holding under 0.5% of supply — together control ~1.5× the supply held by the big-holder tier (≥1%). The chart below breaks the population into four supply-share bands; each band's height shows the share of supply it controls.

Supply by wallet tier

Share of circulating supply held by each wallet-size bucket (% of 256M)

AIKEK adoption on Solana has reached critical mass. The Solana liquidity additions kicked off a sustained climb in Solana's share of supply, and the launch of the AIKEK app accelerated it further. Solana now holds more than twice the supply Base does — making it the dominant non-Ethereum chain for AIKEK.

Cross-chain TVL & burns

Share of supply held by bridges or burned (% of 256M)

In 2026, the count of large holders is steadily growing. The ≥1% tier — wallets each holding at least 1% of total supply — turned positive in 2026. The 0.5–1% and 0.1–0.5% tiers show the same inflection.

Dynamics of large holders

Wallet count in each large-holder tier (≥0.1% of supply and above)

The <0.1% bucket is omitted; the long tail would dwarf the other tiers by an order of magnitude.

The 2025 and 2026 cohorts of top holders are accumulating. Wallets that joined the top 10 in 2025 — and today's top 10 (the 2026 cohort) — have held flat or added to their positions, a sharp departure from the 2023 and 2024 cohorts, who unwound their positions over the same period.

Cohort tracking: top-10

Share of supply held by the top-N wallets at each baseline date, tracked forward

Breadth over time

Total wallet count — how many addresses hold at least 1 whole AIKEK, excluding smart contracts.

Total holder count

Currently 1,474 wallets holding ≥ 1 AIKEK (excl. LP)

Three takes on concentration

The simplest one is top-N share — what fraction of non-LP supply is held by the top 10, 50, and 100 wallets. Lower = more decentralized.

Top-N share of non-LP supply

Concentration in the top-N wallets, excluding LP/bridges

Pareto α tells you how evenly the largest wallets are sized — high α = roughly equal, low α = a handful dwarf the rest. Higher = more decentralized.

Pareto α at supply-share tail cutoffs

Higher α = thinner tail (less concentration).

The Nakamoto coefficient is the smallest number of wallets that together control X% of supply — if 8 wallets hold 50%, the 50% Nakamoto coefficient is 8. Higher = more decentralized.

Nakamoto coefficient

Min wallets controlling each supply threshold. Higher = more decentralized.

The full distribution

All the metrics above are summaries of one underlying picture: the full holder distribution over time. The histogram below shows wallet count per balance bin, log-spaced from 1 AIKEK up to the largest holder.

Holder distribution

Wallet count per AIKEK-balance bin (log-spaced). Click a baseline to toggle.

Charts are computed from real on-chain data, refreshed every 30 minutes.